Several urban planners support modularization management, which disperses all of the businesses, offices, schools, and homes of citizens in various locations. As cities are places that offer necessary amenities to support the residents, in my opinion, the advantages of this system fail to outweigh the disadvantages.
Body paragraph -1
In the first place, organizing cities according to a modularization management mode is just difficult for the populace. In my opinion, it goes against how human communities naturally develop, where we all coexist and assist one another. People won’t have easy access to shopping centres if we segregate the sections for stores, offices, and residences. This would have the unfortunate result of making it impossible for medium- and small-sized stores to survive.
Body paragraph -2
Second, separating apartment buildings from stores, schools, and companies may make commuting more difficult and result in pollution. More specifically, all residents must use public or private transportation to commute to a different place, which means they use more gasoline than usual, as opposed to traveling in one area for work and study. If only five to ten persons traveled in this manner each day, it would not be a major issue. The fact that everyone in the city uses that much fuel to commute at least five days a week is what we find troubling. As a result, both air pollution and noise pollution will be out of our control. On top of everything else, implementing this plan would cost too much money and effort. This presents a significant problem to them because there are so many developing and underdeveloped nations in the world today.
In conclusion, even if centralized administration may have certain advantages, I disagree with this concept because the disadvantages outweigh the advantages by a large margin. I think cities should be the places where residents can obtain all necessary services, and city planners should think about minimizing traffic flows to satisfy environmental requirements.